BotaneBloom considered launching a chatbot powered by a third-party generative AI platform. However, a risk assessment revealed serious concerns related to data privacy, model unpredictability, and lack of transparency. The legal team identified potential GDPR noncompliance. Following internal reviews, executive leadership decided to postpone the chatbot deployment until a more secure and transparent solution could be guaranteed.
Which risk treatment strategy did BotaneBloom apply regarding the chatbot deployment? Refer to Scenario 2.

• A. Risk retention
• B. Risk avoidance
• C. Risk acceptance to pursue an opportunity

What category of decision-making does the implementation of an ISMS belong to within an organization ' s framework?

• A. Strategic
• B. Operational
• C. Tactical

BotaneBloom transitioned to a digital-first business model. Initially, its new online store began processing credit card payments directly. To comply with a relevant security standard, the company reviewed requirements such as encrypting cardholder data, limiting access, and maintaining a secure network.
Based on Scenario 2, which framework did BotaneBloom follow to securely manage credit card payments through its online store?

• A. ISO/IEC 27701
• B. PCI DSS
• C. GDPR

Scenario 4: FinSecure
Finsecure is a financial institution based in Finland, providing services to a diverse clientele, encompassing retail banking, corporate banking, wealth management, and digital banking, all tailored to meet the evolving financial needs of individuals and businesses in the region. Recognizing the critical importance of information security in the modern banking landscape, FinSecure has initiated the implementation of an information security management system (ISMS) based on ISO/IEC 27001. To ensure the successful implementation of the ISMS, the top management decided to contract two experts to lead and oversee the ISMS implementation project.
As a primary strategy for implementing the ISMS, the experts chose an approach that emphasizes a swift implementation of the ISMS by initially meeting the minimum requirements of ISO/IEC 27001, followed by continual improvement over time. Additionally, under the guidance of experts, FinSecure opted for a methodological framework, which serves as a structured framework that outlines the high-level stages of the ISMS implementation, the associated activities, and the deliverables without incorporating any specific tools.
The experts conducted a risk assessment, identifying all the supporting assets, which were the most tangible ones. They assessed the potential consequences and likelihood of various risks, determining the level of risks using a methodical approach that involved defining and characterizing the terms and criteria used in the assessment process. These risks were categorized into nonnumerical levels (e g., very low, low. moderate, high, very high). Explanatory notes were thoughtfully crafted to justify assessed values, with the primary goal of enhancing repeatability and reproducibility.
After completing the risk assessment, the experts reviewed a selected number of the security controls from Annex A of ISO/IEC 27001 to determine which ones were applicable to the company ' s specific context. The decision to implement security controls was justified by the risk assessment results. Based on this review, they drafted the Statement of Applicability (SoA). They focused on treating only the high-risk category particularly addressing unauthorized use of administrator rights and system interruptions due to several hardware failures. To address these issues, they established a new version of the access control policy, implemented controls to manage and control user access, and introduced a control for ICT readiness to ensure business continuity.
Their risk assessment report indicated that if the implemented security controls reduce the risk levels to an acceptable threshold, those risks will be accepted Question:
Did FinSecure identify information system components on which one or several business assets are based?

• A. Yes - the company identified all supporting assets as part of the asset identification process
• B. No - the company identified only the valuable information and some organizational processes
• C. No - the company identified only business assets